How Collaboration Changed Environmental Compliance for the Better
I used to work for a regulator. But instead of policing the civil construction industry with clipboards, warning letters, and threats of prosecution, we tried something different. We built partnerships that actually improved environmental outcomes.
This is the story of how proactive communication, positive recognition, and practical engagement transformed how we worked with the earthworks sector across the Waikato region in New Zealand, and why I’m carrying this approach into my consulting work in Australia today.
Why Enforcement Alone Wasn’t Working
Like many regulators, Waikato Regional Council had traditionally relied on a compliance-and-enforcement model. Contractors were expected to interpret lengthy consents, navigate technical conditions, and deliver best-practice erosion and sediment control with little proactive support.
The reality? Annual compliance reports showed inconsistent results. Some contractors genuinely tried but lacked knowledge or resources. Others saw regulators as adversaries and did the bare minimum until they were caught out. Too often, projects ended up with non-compliances, complaints from neighbours, and environmental damage that could have been avoided with earlier conversations.
I came into this space as both a regulator and a communicator. I was finishing my final university paper in environmental management -Communication Strategy and Implementation. I could see a gap: enforcement was necessary, but it wasn’t the whole picture. If we wanted better outcomes, we needed industry on our side.
Starting with a Strategy
With support from my manager, I developed a communications strategy to engage the civil earthworks industry.
The goal was simple: improve environmental and compliance outcomes across the Waikato region through genuine, two-way communication.
The plan had three parts:
- Build a database – know who the contractors were, from large civil companies to smaller operators who might only take on occasional subdivision work.
- Reach out personally – coffees, site visits, phone calls. Understand their pressures, budgets, and deadlines.
- Create tools for ongoing engagement – practical, plain-language communication that helped contractors stay one step ahead.
It wasn’t complicated. But it worked!
The Initiatives
The Annual Earthworks Awards
One of the most powerful ideas to come out of those conversations was the Annual Earthworks Awards.
Contractors were invited to nominate projects that demonstrated outstanding environmental and compliance achievements. The point wasn’t to create competition for the biggest or flashiest projects. It was about celebrating the teams that got the fundamentals right. Strong sediment control, smart planning, and a genuine commitment to looking after waterways and neighbours.
The awards were presented at a breakfast event, and the atmosphere was completely different from the typical compliance meeting. Contractors brought their site supervisors, managers shook hands with regulators, and people shared practical ideas that others could take away.
One winner said to me afterward, “It’s the first time I’ve ever felt recognised by council for doing the right thing, not just punished when we get it wrong.” That comment stayed with me. Positive recognition created pride, and pride drove higher standards across the board.
The Sitelines Newsletter
The second initiative was the Sitelines Newsletter, a quarterly publication tailored specifically for the civil earthworks industry.
Each edition was aligned to the construction calendar with focuses like:
- Summer: Dust management tips and case studies.
- Autumn: Preparing for winter shutdowns.
- Winter: Consent applications and erosion and sediment control planning.
- Spring: Ramping up for the busy construction season.
The newsletter wasn’t written in legal jargon. It was short, visual, and plain English. It included real examples from sites in the region, seasonal reminders, and photos of good practice.
Contractors told me they actually looked forward to it. Some pinned copies on site office walls. Others shared it in toolbox talks. It became a way to keep environmental compliance front-of-mind without feeling like a lecture.
Real Results on Real Projects
Faster Approvals
One of the most measurable outcomes of early engagement was faster approvals to start work.
Previously, erosion and sediment control plans (ESCPs) were often submitted late or incomplete, leading to delays, redesigns, and sometimes costly stop-work notices. Once we started engaging early, contractors knew exactly what the council needed and why.
For major infrastructure projects, turnaround times for management plans dropped dramatically. The most impressive example was a large joint venture project that went from tender award to approved construction start in just five months.
We achieved this by structuring a staggered approval process, where plans for priority areas were reviewed first. That allowed earthworks to start on schedule, while more complex plans were refined in parallel. Compliance wasn’t compromised, but progress wasn’t stalled either.
Smarter Design on the Huntly Expressway
Another highlight came on the Huntly section of the Waikato Expressway.
A legacy pump station in the area was due for replacement. The easy option would have been to replicate the existing design. Instead, through early consultation with council staff and engineers, the new design incorporated:
- Flood risk management tailored to the local catchment.
- Consideration of the unique peaty soils in the area.
- A staged dewatering system that worked with the natural hydrology.
The outcome wasn’t just compliant it was resilient. The pump station is expected to function effectively for the next 25-30 years. That kind of foresight only comes from collaboration.
Working with Fish and Game
Sometimes collaboration meant challenging existing conditions.
In one project, consent conditions required a wetland to be created in a location where it would provide little ecological benefit and potentially increase flood risk. Through discussions with Auckland-Waikato Fish and Game, we developed an alternative.
The wetland was instead established in a more ecologically sensitive area, creating genuine habitat benefits while also reducing flooding concerns. It was a rare win-win: better for the environment, and better for the community.
Measuring the Impact
Numbers matter. So I compared data from before and after the strategy was introduced.
- Before: Compliance was largely reactive. Council completed annual compliance reports. Enforcement actions were common. Relationships were tense.
- After: By 2016, just before I left to join a civil construction company, the results were clear:
- Compliance rates had increased significantly.
- Enforcement actions had dropped — in fact, there were no formal enforcement actions for 18 months (for consented sites).
- Relationships between industry and the regulator had improved dramatically.
We had shifted from being adversaries to being partners.
Lessons I Carried Forward
That experience shaped the way I work today in Australia.
As an environmental specialist and now consultant, I’ve seen how easily projects can get bogged down in compliance headaches. But I’ve also seen how a collaborative, practical approach can transform outcomes.
Here are the lessons I carry with me:
- Start conversations early. The earlier contractors and regulators talk, the fewer surprises down the track.
- Celebrate success. Recognition is a more powerful motivator than punishment.
- Make information accessible. Plain language and practical tools work better than technical reports no one reads.
- Build trust. Trust isn’t built in meetings; it’s built in site visits, coffee chats, and showing up when people need help.
- Keep compliance practical. At the end of the day, contractors want to build. Compliance needs to support that, not block it.
Applying This in Australia
Since moving to Melbourne, I’ve been applying the same philosophy with small and medium-sized businesses in civil construction, drainage, and earthworks.
The regulatory landscape here has its own challenges. EPA Victoria, for example, has adopted a “duty to manage” approach, which requires businesses to proactively identify and control environmental risks. For smaller contractors, that can feel overwhelming.
This is where engagement makes the difference. Instead of waiting for an inspection or an infringement notice, I work alongside businesses to:
- Identify risks like sediment runoff, dust, and waste tracking.
- Put in place simple, affordable controls.
- Train staff so compliance becomes part of daily site culture, not an afterthought.
- Build systems that keep businesses “approval ready” without endless paperwork.
The result? Contractors are less stressed, regulators see better compliance, and the community benefits from cleaner waterways and reduced environmental impacts.
Why Collaboration Matters
At its heart, collaboration isn’t about making life easier for contractors or regulators. It’s about the bigger picture.
Every project we build leaves a legacy — for our communities, our landscapes, and our future generations. When regulators and industry work together, that legacy can be something we’re proud of: resilient infrastructure, protected ecosystems, and communities that trust the people shaping their environment.
And when we fall back on enforcement alone, we miss that opportunity.
Let’s Work Together
If you’re part of the civil construction industry, or if you work within a regulatory agency and want to explore a more proactive, practical engagement model — I’d love to talk.
Let’s turn good intentions into long-term, on-the-ground results.
Because collaboration doesn’t just tick boxes. It builds trust. It builds resilience. And it builds a future we can all stand behind.
#EnvironmentalConsulting #ConstructionCompliance #EarthworksManagement #SiteRiskManagement #CollaborationForChange #WorkingTogether #RegulatoryCompliances
TIH Consulting 
Leave a comment